The Emergent Church
Have any of you become aquainted with the "Emerging" movement within "evangelicalism" (I decided henceforth to distinguish between Big E Evangelicalism, which embodies its Greek root evangel = gospel, and little e evangelicalism, which is just the name of something), as popularized by Brian McLaren? Anyway, I just finished a (somewhat lengthy) series of posts from a friend of mine about it, that I found a quite useful discussion.
Emergent as a movement within evangelicalism Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
He pointed to some pages from "McLarenists", and I was struck by one quote there, how their jargon is a bunch of forceless platitudes, and reads like stereotypical upper management-speak, self-help pep talks, and sales seminars about "new paradigms". Here's the original, and the following is my feeble understanding (my editorial remarks in []). Maybe y'all can help me better understand it:
"The emerging church around the world shares a number of common characteristics, including in most cases, an emergent vocabulary [self-referential and circular?], synoptic outlook [they only like Matthew, Mark and Luke?], creative expression, organic resourcing [reduce dependency on foreign petrol?], fluid strategy [again, petrol?], decentralized leadership, holistic expression, fluency in new media [ahh... this one I get... "God spoke and there was PowerPoint"], postmodern sensibility, structural simplicity, countercultural origins [back to the "Jesus freaks..."], an upfront missional focus, modular church expression [what...?] rather than singular, a deep ecclesiology [sub-basements in all church buildings?] attendance at particular yearly festivals [Rosh Hashanna, Ramadan, Juneteenth...], a greater ecumenical commitment and social concern and so on" (Andrew Jones, The Emerging Conversation: Unabridged)
So.... what?
2 Comments:
I don't know if you've seen this yet, but I thought his definition of the "The Emerging Church" was on target:
"This is a term that refers to churches attended exclusively by white people in their 20s and 30s who have at least one tattoo or body piercing. Their distinguishing characteristics are a refreshing, "up to date" interpretation of Christianity, and a reluctance to directly answer questions."
I hadn't seen that, but thanks for pointing me there, it was HILARIOUS!
Being "white people in their 20s and 30s" makes me wonder that they are failing at their all-inclusiveness. Or maybe they're the only folks who count when it comes to being all-included.
Post a Comment
<< Home